General Motors is once again under the microscope after issuing a technical notice to dealerships about widespread engine misfire problems affecting several of its most popular SUVs. The internal communication, titled GM Preliminary Information Bulletin PIP6071A, addresses a recurring issue with the 1.5L I4 LSD engine found in the 2023–2026 Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain models. Rather than announcing a formal recall, GM has opted to quietly inform dealers how to handle these complaints, effectively placing the burden on vehicle owners to report the problem first.
According to the GM misfire bulletin 2025, affected vehicles may experience rough idling, stalling, hesitation, or lurching during acceleration — symptoms that can compromise both performance and safety. Drivers have also reported loud misfires, loss of power, and persistent check engine lights showing diagnostic codes such as P0300, P2097, P2251, and P223C. While the company suggests a fix may be as simple as replacing a worn-out oxygen sensor in the catalytic converter, the limited scope of this action raises questions about GM’s transparency and accountability.
For California drivers — where strict emissions and consumer protection laws apply — the GM misfire recall California issue could have deeper implications. When a manufacturer knowingly delays a formal recall despite clear evidence of a defect, consumers may be left driving unsafe or unreliable vehicles. As with previous situations involving premature mechanical wear or emissions problems, this issue underscores the importance of early detection, documentation, and legal awareness under California’s Lemon Law.
Understanding the Bulletin: What Went Wrong
At the core of the GM service bulletin misfire issues is a premature failure of the “position 1” oxygen sensor, which plays a critical role in maintaining proper air-fuel mixture and emissions balance. When this sensor begins to fail, it provides inaccurate data to the vehicle’s onboard computer, leading to misfires, rough idling, and poor fuel economy. GM’s internal memo instructs dealers to inspect and replace the sensor if necessary, but it also recommends checking the catalytic converter’s internal catalyst bed for early signs of degradation.
This points to a larger systemic issue. If the catalyst bed is deteriorating because of engine misfires, that suggests heat and fuel mixture imbalances have been occurring for quite some time — possibly before drivers even noticed symptoms. The company’s advice to focus on vehicles built before May 27, 2025, indicates GM made a production change after identifying the problem, raising the question: why wasn’t the public informed sooner?
GM’s decision to handle the matter internally rather than through a traditional recall has frustrated many consumers and safety advocates. Without an official recall, affected owners will not automatically receive notification by mail. Instead, they must proactively complain to their dealership to trigger inspection and repair. This approach allows GM to limit repair volume and public exposure — but it also puts the onus on drivers to advocate for their own safety and vehicle performance.
For owners in California, that’s not acceptable. The state’s consumer protection framework ensures manufacturers cannot sidestep accountability simply by labeling a defect as a “bulletin” instead of a “recall.” Whether the issue arises under the GM misfire bulletin 2025 or a formal recall, repeated misfires and engine hesitation can qualify your vehicle as a lemon if the issue persists after multiple service attempts.
Safety Risks and Consumer Concerns
Misfiring engines are not just a nuisance — they pose real safety risks. A vehicle that suddenly lurches, loses power, or stumbles during acceleration can endanger both the driver and others on the road. Misfires can cause unsteady speed control, vibration, or even engine shutdown under load, especially when merging onto highways or overtaking traffic. These are precisely the kinds of symptoms many Equinox and Terrain owners have reported since 2023.
Equally troubling is the potential for long-term engine damage. Misfires generate heat and unburned fuel, which can damage spark plugs, catalytic converters, and oxygen sensors. If ignored, this chain reaction may cause severe mechanical failures that go far beyond a simple sensor replacement. The fact that GM is aware of the issue and has yet to issue a GM misfire recall California raises concerns about whether the company is prioritizing cost savings over customer safety.
From a consumer rights standpoint, GM’s limited internal bulletin also highlights a pattern of reactive rather than proactive behavior. Instead of notifying all owners, the company expects them to “complain first” before taking action — an approach that unfairly shifts responsibility away from the automaker. California’s Lemon Law was designed precisely to protect consumers from such practices, ensuring that when manufacturers neglect to fix known defects promptly, affected owners can seek financial recovery.
Which GM Vehicles Are Affected? 
The affected models include the 2023–2026 Chevrolet Equinox and 2023–2026 GMC Terrain, both equipped with the 1.5L I4 LSD turbocharged gasoline engine. While GM has not provided an exact number of vehicles potentially impacted, these models represent a significant portion of the company’s compact SUV sales nationwide. Early production units — especially those built before May 27, 2025 — appear most at risk, as GM reportedly implemented a quiet production line fix thereafter.
Owners of these SUVs have described a consistent pattern of symptoms: check engine lights triggered by misfire codes, erratic idle, surging while driving, and occasional stalls when stopping or accelerating. Some report that dealerships dismissed these problems as “normal behavior,” only later learning about the GM service bulletin misfire issues after persistent complaints.
Because GM has not yet issued a formal recall, many drivers may be unaware their vehicles qualify for inspection or repair under bulletin PIP6071A. This lack of public communication leaves countless owners in limbo, potentially driving vehicles that misfire, waste fuel, and emit higher levels of pollutants. California drivers should be especially alert — the state’s emissions testing standards mean that vehicles with unresolved misfire issues could fail smog checks, adding financial burdens on top of safety concerns.
GM’s Response and Regulatory Oversight 
General Motors’ response has been cautious and limited. The company’s internal memo frames the misfire problem as an advisory, not a defect requiring public recall. Dealers are instructed to replace the oxygen sensor, check the catalytic converter’s integrity, and test emissions levels before returning the vehicle to service. However, GM’s choice to restrict this fix to those who “complain first” has drawn criticism from consumer safety advocates who argue that the approach undermines transparency.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) may become involved if complaints continue to rise. When a pattern of safety-related engine failures emerges — particularly those leading to stalling or loss of power — the agency can open a defect investigation even without a recall. Should that occur, GM could face increased regulatory pressure to convert the internal bulletin into a full GM misfire recall California campaign.
Industry observers note that automakers often issue “Preliminary Information” bulletins as a way to manage cost and publicity. Yet this strategy frequently backfires, especially when widespread issues come to light later through owner reports. In GM’s case, its handling of the GM misfire bulletin 2025 could spark legal claims if repeated service attempts fail to resolve the defect. California’s Lemon Law explicitly covers situations in which a manufacturer fails to fix recurring performance or safety problems after a reasonable number of repair opportunities.
The Stakes for GM Owners in California
For California drivers, the stakes could not be higher. An SUV that stalls or lurches without warning can put everyone at risk — particularly in dense traffic or during highway travel. Owners expect reliability, not hesitation or power loss every time they step on the gas pedal. Yet GM’s decision to rely on internal service bulletins instead of formal recalls leaves many consumers feeling abandoned and frustrated.
California’s GM engine misfire Lemon Law provides recourse for those caught in this situation. If your Equinox or Terrain has been in the shop multiple times for misfire or check engine light issues — or if the same problem persists after supposed fixes — you may qualify for a buyback, replacement, or cash compensation. The law covers both purchased and leased vehicles and shifts attorney fees to the manufacturer, ensuring that consumers can pursue justice without paying out of pocket.
The broader implications of this case extend beyond individual vehicles. It highlights a recurring problem in how automakers handle technical bulletins — prioritizing cost control over consumer protection. By withholding formal recall notices, manufacturers minimize their liability in the short term but risk long-term damage to their reputation and customer trust. For affected California owners, vigilance, documentation, and legal support are essential to holding GM accountable for its misfiring engines.
How The Barry Law Firm Can Help 
At The Barry Law Firm, we specialize in helping California consumers take legal action against manufacturers when their vehicles fail to meet quality and safety standards. If your Chevrolet Equinox or GMC Terrain has been in the shop repeatedly for engine misfires, or if a GM service bulletin misfire issue repair has not solved the problem, you may be entitled to a refund, replacement, or cash compensation under California’s Lemon Law.
Lemon Law Expertise – We specialize in California Lemon Law cases and know how to hold manufacturers accountable.
No Upfront Costs – The California Lemon Law requires the manufacturer to pay our fees. That means, at The Barry Law Firm, we will never charge you, no matter the outcome of your case.
Proven Success – We have helped thousands of consumers obtain favorable settlements for their defective vehicles.
Personalized Attention – We handle all legal paperwork and negotiations so you don’t have to deal with the stress.
If GM’s limited service bulletin hasn’t resolved your misfire problems, you may have a GM engine misfire Lemon Law case. Contact us today to explore your legal options.
Closing
The GM misfire bulletin reveals a troubling trend in how automakers handle safety and reliability issues — quietly, internally, and only when consumers complain. While GM may hope this approach keeps the issue contained, it leaves many drivers struggling with stalling, hesitation, and costly repair visits. For California owners, this is not merely a maintenance concern — it’s a matter of safety, transparency, and legal accountability.
If your Equinox or Terrain continues to misfire or lurch even after service, document every repair and complaint. Under the GM engine misfire Lemon Law, repeated defects entitle you to real legal protection. At The Barry Law Firm, we’ve seen countless cases where consumers endured months of frustration before realizing they were eligible for compensation. Don’t wait for GM to issue a formal recall — your rights exist now.
Safety, reliability, and honesty must come before corporate convenience. When they don’t, The Barry Law Firm stands ready to help California drivers demand the accountability they deserve.
Email 
Facebook 
Twitter 
Pinterest 
